1.- We.we asked by owns why ?.when ?.or how ?.Could charge the terribles robots as the US films.In the way than liked the roof´s of the moderns and bigger trains sure than have "bald path " with somethingelse
crystallography and then we.we could see the clouds,the sun in the same way -let´s me the analogy -
than the robots could have his owns crystallography in the head - sure with out hair -in the way than as soon as possible they can charge by photosintesis howewer been´s cleary just one day we.we would made does as orgganic matter.
2.- Then other moments of the robots could be -another analogy - in the same way just nobody advice
than the ages piramide were´s the end of unfinish matter and then so ease then we.we have 2 constants
and then the equivalence liked the publics jobs as the employemets of the private sector
sure vwe.we could abstract .
1 = 1.
3.-In other way the tax´s policy mut be as the employement´were´s an asset but not and asset in the
traditional way since a asset everytime the persons must be the first reason howewer tax´s deduction in societis tax´s o everywere´s we.we played with IVA´S.
